Abstract
The two central questions I address are the following: (1) If my claims about interpreting the federal constitution are sound, are they also intrinsically sound for state constitutions that contain different language? (2) Is it always, or sometimes, essentially self-defeating for state courts to define religion in a way different from what is embodied in federal law?
Recommended Citation
Kent Greenawalt, The Concept of Religion in State Constitutions, 8 Campbell L. Rev. 437 (1986).