This note will analyze the background of cases leading up to the rejection of the doctrine of substantial compliance and the effect of those cases, as controlling precedent, in light of the Brady decision. Further, this note will examine the court's opinion to demonstrate that while the court specifically rejected the doctrine it left open the door for recovery by unlicensed general contractors in specific factual circumstances.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.