Abstract
This note will analyze the background of cases leading up to the rejection of the doctrine of substantial compliance and the effect of those cases, as controlling precedent, in light of the Brady decision. Further, this note will examine the court's opinion to demonstrate that while the court specifically rejected the doctrine it left open the door for recovery by unlicensed general contractors in specific factual circumstances.
Recommended Citation
Kimberly Ann Kelly, A New Bright Line Rule for General Construction Contractors - Brady v. Fulghum, 7 Campbell L. Rev. 199 (1984).