This Article examines the contours of the “on-campus” versus “off-campus” distinction embedded in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Mahoney School District v. B.L. This Article argues that B.L., and the Court’s broader Tinker doctrine, fail to adequately address modern student speech issues, especially student speech arising in extracurricular programs and activities. This Article proposes a two-part legal framework for future courts to analyze student speech issues in an increasingly digital post-pandemic world.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.