Walter L. Jones


This Note will discuss how other jurisdictions have attempted to deal with recanted testimony and the criticisms directed toward these methods. This Note will further discuss why the modified version of the Larrison rule, as adopted by the North Carolina Supreme Court, is immune from these same criticisms. With Britt, the court seems to have adopted Larrison's positive principles without adding fuel to the conflict that decision created.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.