It is the central thesis of this paper that what is needed to assess the validity of many of the criticisms directed toward legal practice and training, and to resolve many of the controversies surrounding attempts to correct these criticisms, is a representation or documentation of the structure of expertise in legal practice - especially in trial advocacy since this represents the focus of most complaints. Without such a representation it is difficult to support allegations of incompetence or to defend the efficiency of specific reform on other than subjective or intuitive grounds. At this time no systematic representation exists.
Paul E. Johnson, Michael G. Johnson, and Raleigh K. Little, Expertise in Trial Advocacy: Some Considerations for Inquiry into Its Nature and Development, 7 Campbell L. Rev. 119 (1984).