Can the General Assembly Turn Back the Hands of Time? McKinney v. Goins and the Constitutionality of the "Revival Provision" in North Carolina's SAFE Child Act

Authors

Allison HeitchueFollow

Abstract

This Comment analyzes the current debate over the constitutionality of the SAFE Child Act’s “Revival Provision” under the North Carolina Constitution through the case McKinney v. Goins and argues why the North Carolina Supreme Court should find the “Revival Provision” constitutional.

Recommended Citation

Allison Heitchue, Can the General Assembly Turn Back the Hands of Time? McKinney v. Goins and the Constitutionality of the "Revival Provision" in North Carolina's SAFE Child Act, 46 Campbell L. Rev. 221 (2024).