•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This Note has five purposes. First, this Note reviews the facts of Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. Second, this Note examines the judicial logic of the Brown decision. Third, this Note addresses public policy concerns left unanswered by the courts. Fourth, this Note examines Brown's impact on N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4). Finally, this Note concludes that while Brown should be applauded for extending the duty to defend, the court unnecessarily stretched basic principles of contract law to justify its decision.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.